Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
Summary
In affected versions, the HTTP Host request header was not validated before being used to reconstruct request.url. Because the routing algorithm relies on the raw HTTP path while request.url is rebuilt from the Host header, a malformed header could make request.url.path differ from the path that was actually requested. Middleware and endpoints that apply security restrictions based on request.url (rather than the raw scope path) could therefore be bypassed.
Details
When a client requests http://example.com/foo, it sends:
``http
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
`
Affected versions reconstructed the URL by concatenating http://{host}{path} and re-parsing the result. The Host value is only valid as a uri-host [ ":" port ] per RFC 9112 §3.2, where uri-host follows the restricted host grammar of RFC 3986 §3.2.2. When it contains characters outside that grammar - notably /, ?, or # - those characters move the path/query/fragment boundaries during re-parsing, so the parsed request.url.path no longer matches the path the server actually received. For example:
`http
GET /foo HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com/abc?bar=
`
reconstructs to http://example.com/abc?bar=/foo, whose parsed path is /abc - even though routing used the real path /foo. The router still dispatches to /foo and the endpoint executes, but any middleware or code that reads request.url.path sees /abc, so path-based authorization checks can be bypassed.
Impact
Any application running an affected version that relies on request.url (or request.url.path) for security-sensitive decisions is affected. The most common case is middleware that gates access to certain path prefixes based on request.url.path. Deployments fronted by a proxy or load balancer are mitigated only if that proxy rejects or normalizes the malformed Host header before forwarding and the application does not trust attacker-controlled host headers (e.g. X-Forwarded-Host) elsewhere.
Mitigation
Upgrade to a patched version, which validates the Host header against the grammar of RFC 9112 §3.2 / RFC 3986 §3.2.2 when constructing request.url and falls back to scope["server"]` for malformed values.
Starlette has possible denial-of-service vector when parsing large files in multipart forms
Summary
When parsing a multi-part form with large files (greater than the default max spool size) starlette will block the main thread to roll the file over to disk. This blocks the event thread which means we can't accept new connections.
Details
Please see this discussion for details: https://github.com/encode/starlette/discussions/2927#discussioncomment-13721403. In summary the following UploadFile code (copied from here) has a minor bug. Instead of just checking for self._in_memory we should also check if the additional bytes will cause a rollover.
``python
@property
def _in_memory(self) -> bool:
# check for SpooledTemporaryFile._rolled
rolled_to_disk = getattr(self.file, "_rolled", True)
return not rolled_to_disk
async def write(self, data: bytes) -> None:
if self.size is not None:
self.size += len(data)
if self._in_memory:
self.file.write(data)
else:
await run_in_threadpool(self.file.write, data)
`
I have already created a PR which fixes the problem: https://github.com/encode/starlette/pull/2962
PoC
See the discussion here for steps on how to reproduce.
Impact
To be honest, very low and not many users will be impacted. Parsing large forms is already CPU intensive so the additional IO block doesn't slow down starlette` that much on systems with modern HDDs/SSDs. If someone is running on tape they might see a greater impact.
python-jose denial of service via compressed JWE content
python-jose through 3.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) during a decode via a crafted JSON Web Encryption (JWE) token with a high compression ratio, aka a "JWT bomb." This is similar to CVE-2024-21319.
Pydantic regular expression denial of service
Regular expression denial of service in Pydantic < 2.4.0, < 1.10.13 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via a crafted email string.
Starlette has Path Traversal vulnerability in StaticFiles
Summary
When using StaticFiles, if there's a file or directory that starts with the same name as the StaticFiles directory, that file or directory is also exposed via StaticFiles which is a path traversal vulnerability.
Details
The root cause of this issue is the usage of os.path.commonprefix():
https://github.com/encode/starlette/blob/4bab981d9e870f6cee1bd4cd59b87ddaf355b2dc/starlette/staticfiles.py#L172-L174
As stated in the Python documentation (https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.path.html#os.path.commonprefix) this function returns the longest prefix common to paths.
When passing a path like /static/../static1.txt, os.path.commonprefix([full_path, directory]) returns ./static which is the common part of ./static1.txt and ./static, It refers to /static/../static1.txt because it is considered in the staticfiles directory. As a result, it becomes possible to view files that should not be open to the public.
The solution is to use os.path.commonpath as the Python documentation explains that os.path.commonprefix works a character at a time, it does not treat the arguments as paths.
PoC
In order to reproduce the issue, you need to create the following structure:
``
├── static
│ ├── index.html
├── static_disallow
│ ├── index.html
└── static1.txt
`
And run the Starlette app with:
`py
import uvicorn
from starlette.applications import Starlette
from starlette.routing import Mount
from starlette.staticfiles import StaticFiles
routes = [
Mount("/static", app=StaticFiles(directory="static", html=True), name="static"),
]
app = Starlette(routes=routes)
if __name__ == "__main__":
uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=8000)
`
And running the commands:
`shell
curl --path-as-is 'localhost:8000/static/../static_disallow/'
curl --path-as-is 'localhost:8000/static/../static1.txt'
`
The static1.txt and the directory static_disallow` are exposed.
Impact
Confidentiality is breached: An attacker may obtain files that should not be open to the public.
Credits
Security researcher Masashi Yamane of LAC Co., Ltd reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC Vulnerability Coordination Group and they contacted us to coordinate a patch for the security issue.
